Contact finder · Updated
Wiza review (2026): strong coverage on every input we tested
Wiza turns LinkedIn and Sales Navigator lists into emails and phone numbers, and its API was among the strongest on most of our contact tests. Email lookups are slow, and plans are priced per user.
pipe0 buys data from Wiza and uses it in its waterfalls. The scores come from our own benchmark, not from that relationship. How we review
Our score for Wiza, the average of four criteria
One of the most consistent contact data APIs we tested, strong from LinkedIn URLs and from names and domains, with cheap API credits and an MCP server. Email reveals take seconds to minutes.
Best for
- Sales teams that prospect in LinkedIn Sales Navigator
- Developers who want one API for emails, personal emails, and phones
- Waterfalls that need a cheap, broad first provider
Skip it if
- You need a work email back in under a second
- Your team is large and few people need data
- You need company signals rather than contact details
Export a Sales Navigator search or a LinkedIn profile with the Chrome extension and get emails and phones back. A free plan to start.
73% on name and domain lookups, 66% on mobiles and work emails, and level with the best on personal email in our benchmark.
API credits are cheap, about 5 cents an email and 12.5 cents a phone. App plans are per user, and credits don't roll over.
An async API with webhooks and an MCP server with OAuth. Work email reveals average about 25 seconds, so plan for polling.
Wiza at a glance
- Customers
- 50,000+ businesses, according to Wiza Source
- Database
- 850M+ contacts, according to Wiza Source
- Data
- Work email, personal email, and up to 3 mobiles per person Source
- API
- Async reveals with polling or webhooks; LinkedIn URL, name and domain, or email as input Source
- MCP server
- mcp.wiza.co, OAuth or API key; Claude, Claude Code, and Codex Source
- Integrations
- Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Attio, Outreach, Salesloft, Clay, Zapier Source
Wiza in our benchmark
We ran the same records through every provider we test and counted who returned a result. These are Wiza's numbers from August and September 2026.
| Test | Records | Coverage | Agreement | Median time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name and domain to work emailSignup emails | 100 | 73% | 89% | – |
| LinkedIn URL to work emailLinkedIn profiles | 120 | 65.8% | – | – |
| LinkedIn URL to mobileLinkedIn profiles | 150 | 65.3% | 70% | 3.0 s |
| LinkedIn URL to personal emailLinkedIn profiles | 150 | 52% | 78% | – |
How fast Wiza answers
LinkedIn URL to mobile. Median response time per lookup, lower is faster.
Wiza
Surfe
Amplemarket
Premium
Wiza answered in 3.0 s, 6x faster than Amplemarket on this test.
How often Wiza agrees with other providers
LinkedIn URL to mobile. Each square is one person both providers returned a mobile number for.
Compared with
vs Fiber AI
97%91 of 94
Wiza and Fiber AI returned the same mobile number for 91 of 94 people.
Compared with
vs Surfe
74%73 of 98
Wiza and Surfe returned the same mobile number for 73 of 98 people.
- On personal email, Wiza and Forager tied for the most found, 52% each.
- Name and domain are derived from each signup email, so that test measures finding a person's address format, not finding the company.
- Samples are small, 100 to 150 records per test, so treat a few points of difference as noise.
- The LinkedIn profile set passed one vendor's resolvability filter, so absolute rates run higher than on a typical list. Comparisons between providers stay fair.
- The signup set is real pipe0 signup emails with no vendor involved in choosing them, a harder and more realistic population than the profile set.
- Agreement is the share of results that match what other providers returned for the same person. It is a proxy for accuracy, not ground truth.
Run ids: 20260907T143742Z-3e4b, 20260814T095606Z-9ef2, 20260804T202803Z-237d, 20260814T102434Z-7165. How we test
What is Wiza?
Wiza started as the tool that turns a LinkedIn Sales Navigator search into a spreadsheet of emails, and that is still how most of its 50,000-plus business customers use it. Export a search, a lead list, or a Recruiter project, or open a profile with the Chrome extension, and Wiza adds work emails, personal emails, and up to three mobile numbers per person.
Underneath is an API that does the same from a LinkedIn URL, a name and a company domain, or an email address, plus an MCP server for agents.
Consistent where others aren't
Most contact providers are good at one input and weak at another. Wiza was strong on most of them in our benchmark. Given the names and company domains of 100 real pipe0 signups, it found a work email for 73. From 120 LinkedIn profiles it found 66% of work emails, and from 150 profiles it found 65% of mobile numbers. On personal email, it tied for first at 52%.
That consistency is why it runs first in pipe0's default mobile and work email waterfalls. When Wiza and Fiber both found a mobile number for the same person, they matched 91 times out of 94.
Speed: fast phones, slow emails
Wiza verifies emails in real time instead of serving them from a cache, and that costs time. Its own docs put an average work email reveal at about 25 seconds, sometimes several minutes. Phone numbers are a different story: in our test they came back in a median of 3 seconds, faster than Surfe at 4.4 seconds and Amplemarket at 18.6.
The API is asynchronous for that reason. You start a reveal and either poll for the result or give Wiza a webhook to call.
What it costs
There are two ways to pay. App plans are per user: a free plan with 20 emails and 5 phones, Starter at $49 a user per month, and Email + Phone at $199, or $166 billed annually for unlimited reveals with 2,500 bulk exports a month. Monthly credits reset on the billing date.
The API has its own credits at 2.5 cents each. An email costs 2 credits and a phone 5, so about 5 and 12.5 cents, charged only when Wiza finds something. For a developer or an agent, that is one of the lower prices in the market.
Wiza and pipe0
We buy data from Wiza. It runs first in pipe0's default mobile and work email waterfalls, chosen on price and the coverage above, with Surfe and Crustdata behind it for the people it misses.
Who should buy Wiza
Buy Wiza if your team prospects in Sales Navigator, or if you need one API that finds emails, personal emails, and phones from whatever input you have.
Look elsewhere if you need an email back in under a second, or if a large team needs data but only a few people would use a seat.
Wiza pros and cons
Pros
Consistent across inputs
From a name and domain, Wiza found 73 of 100 work emails. From LinkedIn profiles, it found 66% of work emails and 65% of mobiles, and tied for first on personal email.
Cheap API credits
API credits cost 2.5 cents each: 2 per email and 5 per phone, so about 5 and 12.5 cents, and nothing is charged when no data is found.
Built around Sales Navigator
Export a search or list from Sales Navigator or Recruiter, or reveal one profile with the Chrome extension, and enrich it in place.
Fast phone reveals
Mobile numbers came back in a median of 3 seconds in our test, faster than the two highest-coverage phone providers.
Cons
Slow email reveals
Wiza says a work email reveal averages about 25 seconds and can take several minutes, because it verifies in real time.
Per-user plans
App plans are priced per user, from $49 a month, and monthly credits reset on the billing date without rolling over.
Unlimited has a cap
Annual plans advertise unlimited emails, but bulk list exports stop at 2,500 a month.
API access is separate
The API runs on its own credit pool, bought separately from the app plans, and only the Team plan lists API access.
Wiza pricing
Wiza has a free plan. Paid plans start at $49/mo per user for Starter, billed monthly.
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 20 valid emails and 5 phone numbers. |
| Starter | $49/user/mo | 100 emails and 100 phones a month. |
| Email + Phone | $199/user/mo, or $166/mo annual | 500 emails and 500 phones a month; annual is unlimited reveals with 2,500 bulk exports a month. |
| API credits | $0.025 a credit, from $50 | 1 credit per profile, 2 per email, 5 per phone, charged only when data is found. |
| Team | Custom | 3+ users, annual, API access. |
- Only valid emails are charged; risky emails are free to export.
- Monthly plan credits reset on the billing date and don't roll over.
- Extra reveals on app plans cost $0.15 per email and $0.35 per phone.
Prices as of Oct 8, 2026, from Wiza's pricing page.
Wiza alternatives
| Alternative | Pick it when |
|---|---|
| pipe0 | You want Wiza as the first step of a waterfall, with Surfe and Crustdata behind it, billed per result with no per-user plans. |
| Surfe | You need the highest mobile coverage and work from LinkedIn into a CRM. |
| FullEnrich | You want a hands-off waterfall for emails and phones from a CSV. |
| Prospeo | You need sub-second email lookups and pay per credit. |
Frequently asked questions
Is Wiza's data good?
In our benchmark Wiza was strong on most inputs: 73% of work emails from names and domains, 66% of work emails and 65% of mobiles from LinkedIn profiles, and tied for first on personal email at 52%.
How much does Wiza cost?
Wiza has a free plan with 20 emails and 5 phones. App plans start at $49 per user a month. API credits are sold separately at 2.5 cents each: 2 credits per email and 5 per phone, charged only when found.
Does Wiza have an API and an MCP server?
Yes. The API is asynchronous: you start a reveal and poll or wait for a webhook. The MCP server at mcp.wiza.co works with Claude, Claude Code, and Codex, and both use API credits.
Why is Wiza slow on emails?
Wiza verifies emails in real time rather than serving cached results. It says a work email reveal averages about 25 seconds; phone numbers came back in about 3 seconds in our test.
Wiza or Surfe: which should I choose?
Surfe found more mobile numbers in our benchmark, 96% against 65%. Wiza is the more consistent all-rounder across inputs, including names and domains, and its API credits are cheaper per result.
Next-gen enrichment & search.
Build revenue systems that scale. For humans, agents, and apps. Replace tools like Clay, n8n, Hightouch, etc.
Try pipe0