Agent data tools · Updated
Forager review (2026): the fastest contact data we measured
Forager is a B2B data API that answered phone lookups in 80 milliseconds in our benchmark, with numbers that matched premium sources and a tie for the most personal emails found. It has no MCP server.
pipe0 buys data from Forager and uses it in its waterfalls. The scores come from our own benchmark, not from that relationship. How we review
Our score for Forager, the average of four criteria
The fastest contact data API we measured, at 80 milliseconds a phone lookup, with fresh LinkedIn-based data and answers that match premium sources. Built for developers, with no MCP server yet.
Best for
- Products and agents that need contact data in real time
- Personal email lookups from LinkedIn profiles
- Platforms that want bulk people and company data as a feed
Skip it if
- You want an MCP server or a no-code prospecting app
- You need the highest mobile coverage from one provider
- You need documented rate limits and billing for every call
Data infrastructure first: an API, bulk data feeds, and a simple web app. Most teams reach it through code or a waterfall.
Its mobile numbers matched Amplemarket and Surfe 86% of the time, it tied for the most personal emails found, and it recrawls every 2.5 weeks.
From $50 a month, with mobiles from 21 to 33 cents and emails from 7 to 11 cents. Credit use per call is not fully documented.
The fastest API we tested, but no MCP server and no published rate limits.
Forager at a glance
- Company
- Forager.ai, LLC Source
- Data
- 850M+ person and company records, refreshed about every 2.5 weeks, according to Forager Source
- Mobile numbers
- 200M+, according to Forager Source
- Delivery
- REST API, bulk feeds to S3, Google Cloud Storage, or Snowflake, and a web app Source
- API
- Mostly synchronous; work email lookups are async with polling or a bulk webhook Source
- GDPR
- Describes itself as primarily a data processor Source
Forager in our benchmark
We ran the same records through every provider we test and counted who returned a result. These are Forager's numbers from August 2026.
| Test | Records | Coverage | Agreement | Median time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn URL to mobileLinkedIn profiles | 150 | 43.3% | 72% | 0.08 s |
| LinkedIn URL to personal emailLinkedIn profiles | 150 | 52% | 80% | – |
How fast Forager answers
LinkedIn URL to mobile. Median response time per lookup, lower is faster.
Forager
Wiza
Amplemarket
Premium
Forager answered in 0.08 s, 233x faster than Amplemarket on this test.
How often Forager agrees with other providers
LinkedIn URL to mobile. Each square is one person both providers returned a mobile number for.
Premium provider
vs Amplemarket
86%50 of 58
Forager and Amplemarket returned the same mobile number for 50 of 58 people.
Compared with
vs Surfe
86%56 of 65
Forager and Surfe returned the same mobile number for 56 of 65 people.
- On personal email, Forager and Wiza tied for the most found, 52% each.
- Samples are small, 150 records per test, so treat a few points of difference as noise.
- The LinkedIn profile set passed one vendor's resolvability filter, so absolute rates run higher than on a typical list. Comparisons between providers stay fair.
- Agreement is the share of results that match what other providers returned for the same person. It is a proxy for accuracy, not ground truth.
Run ids: 20260804T202803Z-237d, 20260814T102434Z-7165. How we test
What is Forager?
Forager is B2B data infrastructure: people, company, and job data for platforms, AI agents, and waterfall tools rather than for salespeople clicking through an app. It says it holds more than 850 million person and company records and 200 million mobile numbers, and it recrawls them about every 2.5 weeks. You can query it by API, or take the whole dataset as a feed into S3, Google Cloud Storage, or Snowflake.
Speed first
Forager's defining number in our benchmark is speed. It answered phone lookups from LinkedIn profiles in a median of 80 milliseconds. Wiza took 3 seconds on the same profiles and Amplemarket 18.6. For a product where a user is waiting, or an agent making hundreds of lookups in a row, that difference is the whole experience.
Speed doesn't come at the cost of accuracy. When Forager and Amplemarket both found a mobile number for the same person, they matched 50 times out of 58, and with Surfe 56 out of 65. Its coverage sits in the middle: it found a mobile for 43% of 150 profiles, behind the providers that run their own waterfalls.
On personal email it was among the best. From the same set of profiles, Forager and Wiza tied for the most consumer addresses found, at 52% each. Its personal email endpoint only returns webmail addresses like Gmail and Outlook, which is usually what a personal email search is for anyway.
What it costs
Plans start at $50 a month for 2,250 credits, then $100 for 5,250 and $250 for 16,200, with 10% off billed annually. A phone number costs 15 credits and an email 5, which Forager itself shows as 21 to 33 cents per mobile and 7 to 11 cents per email. Monthly credits roll over and plans cancel anytime.
The docs leave some questions open. Email lookups that find nothing are free, but the docs don't say whether the same is true for phones, and rate limits aren't published.
Forager for developers
Most endpoints are synchronous and very fast; work email lookups run as async jobs you poll, with a webhook for bulk requests. There is no MCP server, so agents reach Forager through its REST API or through a tool that wraps it.
Forager and pipe0
We buy data from Forager. It is part of pipe0's default personal email waterfall, chosen for the personal email result above, and its speed makes it a good fit wherever an agent is waiting on the answer.
Who should buy Forager
Buy Forager if you are building a product or an agent that needs contact data in real time, or if you want bulk people and company data delivered as a feed.
Look elsewhere if you want an MCP server, a prospecting app for your sales team, or the highest mobile coverage from a single provider.
Forager pros and cons
Pros
Faster than anything else we measured
Forager answered phone lookups in a median of 80 milliseconds, against 3 seconds for Wiza and 18.6 for Amplemarket on the same profiles.
Answers that match premium sources
When Forager and Amplemarket both found a mobile number for the same person, they matched 50 times out of 58. With Surfe, 56 out of 65.
Strong on personal email
From 150 LinkedIn profiles, Forager and Wiza tied for the most personal email addresses found, 52% each.
Fresh data, several ways in
Forager recrawls its records about every 2.5 weeks and delivers them by API or as bulk feeds to S3, Google Cloud Storage, or Snowflake.
Cons
No MCP server
Agents reach Forager through its REST API only. There is no MCP server or agent plugin.
Mid-pack mobile coverage
From 150 LinkedIn profiles it found 43% of mobile numbers, behind the highest-coverage providers.
Gaps in the docs
Rate limits aren't published, and the docs don't say whether a phone lookup that finds nothing is charged.
Personal email means webmail only
The personal email endpoint returns consumer addresses like Gmail and Outlook, and reverse lookups only work on those.
Forager pricing
Forager has no free plan. Paid plans start at $50/mo for Starter, billed monthly ($45 annual).
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $50/mo, $45 annual | 2,250 credits a month. |
| Growth | $100/mo, $90 annual | 5,250 credits a month. |
| Pro | $250/mo, $225 annual | 16,200 credits a month. |
| Enterprise | Custom | Volume pricing and data feeds. |
- Person details cost 1 credit, a work or personal email 5, a phone number 15, and a reverse email lookup 5.
- Forager shows effective prices of 21 to 33 cents per mobile and 7 to 11 cents per email, depending on the plan.
- Email lookups that find nothing are free. Monthly credits roll over, and plans can be cancelled anytime.
Prices as of Oct 8, 2026, from Forager's pricing page.
Forager alternatives
| Alternative | Pick it when |
|---|---|
| pipe0 | You want Forager's speed inside a waterfall with higher-coverage providers behind it, plus an MCP server. |
| Crustdata | You need live company signals and an agent-ready MCP setup. |
| Fiber AI | You want a data API with MCP servers and strong email lookups. |
| Surfe | Mobile coverage is the priority. |
Frequently asked questions
How fast is Forager?
In our benchmark Forager answered phone lookups from LinkedIn profiles in a median of 80 milliseconds, the fastest of any provider we have measured, against 3 seconds for Wiza and 18.6 for Amplemarket.
How much does Forager cost?
Plans start at $50 a month for 2,250 credits, then $100 for 5,250 and $250 for 16,200, about 10% less billed annually. A phone number costs 15 credits and an email 5, which Forager shows as 21 to 33 cents per mobile and 7 to 11 cents per email.
Is Forager's data accurate?
Its mobile numbers matched Amplemarket's on 50 of 58 people and Surfe's on 56 of 65 in our benchmark, and it recrawls its records about every 2.5 weeks.
Does Forager have an MCP server?
No. Forager offers a REST API and bulk data feeds, but no MCP server or agent plugin.
Next-gen enrichment & search.
Build revenue systems that scale. For humans, agents, and apps. Replace tools like Clay, n8n, Hightouch, etc.
Try pipe0